DOJ: It's Okay To Raid Trump's Home, But Not Bill Clinton's
Noah Domingues explains the unlawfulness of the Mar-a-lago raid and the political bias of the FBI.
If you've been following any of the news lately, left or not, you will be aware of what happenned at President Trump's Florida home, named Mar-a-lago, just a few weeks back. Bu in case you haven't heard, here's a summary: Under authorization from Attorney General Merrick Garland of the DOJ, the FBI broke into Mar-a-lago, one of President Trump's many homes, under the pretense that they were searching for documents. These documents were apparently illegally taken by President Trump when he left office, and many of them are claimed to be 'classified'. President Trump was not in the building when the raid was conducted. There is much speculation as to whether the documents actually exist and whether the raid was carried out simply to make Trump look bad, however the FBI claims that although they seized several documents, President Trump still has many others hidden away. They claim that of these remaining documents is a note left from Barack Obama to President Trump when Obama left office. But we're not questioning whether the documents actually exist, or whether Trump actually took anything, we'll save that for another time. What we are questioning is the legality of the raid, and whether their claims were founded.
The DOJ, especially Merrick Garland (who appears to be the face of this whole thing) has come up with countless exuses and justiications for the raid on the home of President Trump (Notice the lack of the word 'former', due to election integrity issues). But are any of these claims actually founded, and can they be used as a legal basis to conduct a raid? That's what we're about to find out.
Let's start with a story that you may be unaware of. The DOJ is claiming that President Trump took documents from the White House, including classified material, when he left office after his presidential term. They are telling us that they needed to raid Mar-a-lago in order to seize the documents and 'help protect democracy'. But what they don't tell you is how this story is very closely related to something that happened back when Bill Clinton left office, however the DOJ's actions were very different back then.